By: Adeeb Chowdhury

For some, Avijit Roy was the harbinger of freethinking, an incandescent augury,
heralding in a new era placing emphasis on logic, science, and reason, and ridding ourselves of
past superstitions and erroneous, fallacious beliefs, and a forerunner of the nationwide deviation
from the irrational. He served as a beacon of social progress, an icon of scientific enlightenment,
skepticism, inquiry, evaluation, and investigation. He embodied the trump of skepticism over
thoughtless submission.

For others, however, universally of a religious disposition, Roy was a nasty omen, a bad
egg, a black sheep awaiting slaughter. His work threatened the very roots of the deep-seated
beliefs adhered to by the majority, an intimidation to the most intimate and irredeemably
indispensable doctrines in the hearts of the masses. He stressed science and reason rather than
blind and unshakeable faith, contradicting the core tenets of what they hold dear. In their eyes,
Roy posed a challenge that shook their beliefs to the core, daring to expose the fraudulence of
what they regarded to be the most infallible and inerrant of beliefs.

So, naturally, they did what they felt spurred to. Just like the nasty schoolyard bully who
dominates, terrifies, and pummels anyone who dares to disagree with him, the religious fanatics
of Bangladesh took the initiative to drive a machete through his skull.

And for what? What was his crime? Atheism? Skepticism? The intellectual honesty and
courage to not accept something simply on the basis of “people say it’s true”? If the religious
genuinely believe that their beliefs originate from the perfect, infallible word of God, why would
it bother them so much that writers like Roy challenge their authenticity? Surely something that
is divine and holy and perfect will be able to withstand the criticism of mere humans? Are
religious beliefs so fragile, are believers trapped in such a state of cognitive dissonance, that they
are prepared to slaughter anyone who pipes up with, “You know, you might be wrong. Let me
point out why”?

Freethinking and skepticism aren’t exactly the most favorable mannerisms to adopt in
today’s Bangladesh. There seems to be a negative stigma that skepticism remains enshrouded in.
This seems rather counterproductive, since logic and reason embody the pinnacle of human
intellect. Science lies at the heart of all of human progress, giving rise to all that we know and
understand, giving birth to the entirety of technology. Science is not something to be
undermined, not something to be unappreciated. It’s something to be glorified, conveyed, and
popularized. Sadly, anti-intellectualism runs amok in anti-scientific cultures, and that is what
Bangladesh seems to be ostensibly devolving into now.

Recent news has seen the demonization and antagonization of logic at a nationwide level.
Citizens have embarked upon a voyage that will do nothing but harm Bangladesh—the active
avoidance of reason and rationality. In my class, I personally know multiple peers who
deliberately eschew logic, undermine science, adhere to twisted prejudices against LGBT
citizens, and derogatorily, dismissively labeling writers like Roy as “Nastiks.” One girl has even
expressed her intentions to avoid and dismiss logic as much as possible because it poses a threat
to her deep-seated beliefs. Bloggers like Roy have devoted their time and work to exposing the
deeply-held beliefs of Bangladesh that, at their core, reek of prejudice, homophobia, and
primitive superstition, and bring nothing new to the table. While religion has undoubtedly made
some positive contributions to society throughout history, it has now devolved into a vestigial
doctrine, overtaken by science and humanism.

Avijit Roy lit aflame a new movement in Bangladesh; he ignited a new school of thought,
a new way of seeing the world, a new system of skeptically interrogating and scrutinizing what
people dogmatically assert to be true. I can confidently postulate that his life and martyrdom will
be preserved in Bengali history as a pivotal point, a moment Bangladesh made a U-turn from
dogma and delved into the far more dazzling world of science and rationality. Roy has served as
a herald, signifying a revolution that will shake Bangladesh to its core—a new age of reason is